Hacksaw, Witworth please come back

[Tonnystark]

I think that most of what he contributes has be pretty accurate as late...the comment's have been toned down sometime now... it is a shame that some former contributers no longer do such, but that is their choice..

If there were something to which I'd need a sure and concise answer to, I would not rely soley on Info provided by whit with out further verifications of others here or my own further researches

as an EXAMPLE : Say i was riding a road course and was given a choice to whom was to instruct me...It would be someone with proven or proveable credentials...

[Witworth]

as an EXAMPLE : Say i was riding a road course and was given a choice to whom was to instruct me...It would be someone with proven or proveable credentials...

That would be me then.

Danger, is my business."

[Witworth]

what bothers me :
A significant number of reputable site members who have contributed valuable input to this site are discouraged/irritated by Witworth and possibly could stop contributing. It has happen on a couple significant threads.


A couple of members think they know who is posting as Witworth but think his contributions add to the site even if we lose solid contributors.
How many have reduced their input or have left ?

As Ken said in another thread how can anyone take what he says as fact ? I post pictures of things I've done and things I own to share and establish some form of proof to support whatever I'm posting or for other to review. So what's Witworth's game ? Proof would only solidify his posts as a solid contributor but his refusal to back anything up and expect us to believe everything he says/does is a product of a troubled persons attempt at a sick joke or a bold faced liar. Witworth may read this and ignore it or provide one of his multi-message attempts at humor or his version of truth.

A case of Schrödinger's witworth? May well be.



Is there credibility, does it exist? Will it collapse when the veil is lifted?

Danger, is my business."

[Tonnystark]

That would be me then.

Danger, is my business."

As you have not given any credentials here that I have seen or had heard of.... that would be for me "Not likely at this time" ...

Wit , things such as the above reply are just boast, this one stated to egg others on ...
Is there anything you can provide to change your boast to a fact ?

oh by the way Rube Goldburg would be proud of that last picture!! nicely done..

[Witworth]

As you have not given any credentials here that I have seen or had heard of.... that would be for me "Not likely at this time" ...

Wit , things such as the above reply are just boast, this one stated to egg others on ...
Is there anything you can provide to change your boast to a fact ?

oh by the way Rube Goldburg would be proud of that last picture!! nicely done..

Just the facts jack. Not a boast.

Danger, is my business."

[o1marc]

Facts not presented in evidence. Inadmissible

[Witworth]

Facts not presented in evidence. Inadmissible

"Judge What's his name", for all the justice East of the Peco's?



Danger, is my business."

[Tonnystark]

"Judge What's his name", for all the justice East of the Peco's?



Danger, is my business."

that would be Paul Newman....
Judge Roy Bean...

[o1marc]

that would be Paul Newman....
Judge Roy Bean...

This is weird, when I got the email notification of this post it shows the post in the email. In the email the post reads:


that would be judge Paul Newman....lol
RoyBean...

[Tonnystark]

This is weird, when I got the email notification of this post it shows the post in the email. In the email the post reads:


that would be judge Paul Newman....lol
RoyBean...

I went back in to fix it .. must have loaded the first post and you saved that to open later...I did edit This and moved the Judge a few minutes later as I was still not sure of he being a bean or beam...I checked, Bean.