lol unlikely, they are coated with armourall and still have the little mould hairs sticking out of them.You actually ride it with the trailer tires?
They are new less than a 100 miles on them. I had no issuesYou actually ride it with the trailer tires?
The tires are new no armourall lol and saw plenty eviews on them they do ride very well. I was selling parts separate for money for a situation but turns out I need more money worse than I thought at home. I didnt know I could not sell a motorcycle without front fender( thanks for letting me know). I do have another fender that I will put onlol unlikely, they are coated with armourall and still have the little mould hairs sticking out of them.
Beef, hey how come it says you have the original parts here, but you have a post to sell parts like the front fender separatehow does that work? In a civilized country you are not allowed to road license an open wheeled vehicle.
ohio is not very civilized. there are legal requirements for things on the books, but no inspections to enforce them.In a civilized country you are not allowed to road license an open wheeled vehicle.
Instant 80$ fine here under highway traffic act, then you get to explain why they should not pull your plate.ohio is not very civilized. there are legal requirements for things on the books, but no inspections to enforce them.
interestingly, i can't find anything in the state vehicle code that requires a wheel be covered. it would be discretionary if a cop decided that no fenders constituted an "unsafe condition," i think.
How about the standard practice of removing all of the DOT required side reflectors from your motorcycles and replacing the DOT legal sized tail light and turn signals with smaller then legal non-approved components :/ That's all good too where you guys live? You're not worried about being even more invisible to trafficohio is not very civilized. there are legal requirements for things on the books, but no inspections to enforce them.
interestingly, i can't find anything in the state vehicle code that requires a wheel be covered. it would be discretionary if a cop decided that no fenders constituted an "unsafe condition," i think.
Did you not see that the seat is brown? And it has drag bars? With MATCHING BROWN GRIPS!I dont get it. You can guy a mint stock bike for $3500.
This is fucking stupid.
Whats "custom"? A seat?
Tank looks like the bullshit paint stripper mod.
Controls, headlight and gauges are emgos finest junk.
Tires show that this was owned/built by someone that nether rides nor understands motorcycles so HUGE red flag.
there's no inspections here for anything in the vehicle code-- not lights, tires, mufflers, nor in some other states as well. the law here says turn signals are required for anything built after 1967, but i've got four machines a bit newer than that that never came with any from the factory. all of em have mudguards and chain guards though.How about the standard practice of removing all of the DOT required side reflectors from your motorcycles and replacing the DOT legal sized tail light and turn signals with smaller then legal non-approved components :/ That's all good too where you guys live? You're not worried about being even more invisible to trafficOr is this where y'all say, we only ride on clean dry roads in broad daylight down here.
... By law you are not allowed to remove your chain guard either but for some strange unknown reason that is a modification requirement on all the cafe bobber builds that go through here. Newsflash people, the chain guard is on there to protect the chain from the rear tire, not to keep your pant leg from being caught.
What bikes do you have that never came with signals?there's no inspections here for anything in the vehicle code-- not lights, tires, mufflers, nor in some other states as well. the law here says turn signals are required for anything built after 1967, but I've got four machines a bit newer than that that never came with any from the factory. all of em have mudguards and chain guards though.
directional signals are mostly placebos out here. I'm used to being invisible to the cage drivers, and wouldn't trust oncoming traffic to see a signal even if i had them. i turn the headlight on if i enter a built-up area, but i don't expect people to see that either.
my daily riders are a 1966 A65T, a 1969 B44, a 1970 norton commando, and a 1972 T120RV. the first three never had signals and the last hasn't had them in some 30 years. i also have a 1968 B25 and a 1969 A65T with no signals since new that will be on the road sooner or later. but i have three or four newer machines with signals, and if they're there, i use them. but they shift on the wrong side, so theyre not my first choice for a ride.What bikes do you have that never came with signals?
Pure logic says that if you want people to see you and understand your intent you make yourself visible.
lolYou're living in the past. Headlights on all the time for motorcycles has been law here since 1970.
i'm not one of those guys, jag.Love when motorcycle riders tell stories how how they buck the system and it is better for them.
My favorite comments are when the term cager is used. To me it shows a certain lack of understanding, and a mentality that does not take responsibility.
Keep that rear brake covered if you have to "lay her down" too?
How about not wearing a helmet to keep you safer from neck injuries?