Would that make the on setting be on without any vacuumThere's a bush fix if you just want to defeat the vacuum part; you can replace the spring loaded diaphragm part with a chunk of rubber cut out of an old inner tube.
So just take out that back thing with a “bolt” through it and remove the spring but replace both with a pice of inner tube should do the trick ?Yes to that and it also blocks fuel from leaking out the vacuum ports.
![]()
I would definitely suck if I can’t turn it off but I’ll give it a shotThere's actually 4 parts you won't need any more, the o-ring, diaphragm, spring and the spacer plate with the round hole will all become unneeded. Should be relatively obvious once you have it apart.
Pretty sure the off position will still work, but you might want to check that. would suck if you can't turn it off.
Sounds goodIt's tricky to drill nice clean holes through rubber for the screws to go through, tools that you use for leather or wood work best. Hole punch for leather would be perfect.
that would present a problem, unless you plug one of the ports.There is no “off” position.
I have yet to try it because I didn’t have the time yesterdaythat would present a problem, unless you plug one of the ports.
although if there is no vacuum and the spring is strong enough and the diaphragm is still working that would be an off position. omg it just got complicated I hope he fixed it already
I’ll give it a shot since I can nowI think you are going to have to find a way to plug the prime position opening so you have an off valve. The reserve fuel pipe probably still flows through what was the original vacuum controlled port opening.
confidence is high
So I tried putting a piece of inner tube in instead of the diaphragm and that didn’t workI think you are going to have to find a way to plug the prime position opening so you have an off valve. The reserve fuel pipe probably still flows through what was the original vacuum controlled port opening.
confidence is high